Pdf Theorising Theory In Archaeology вђ Part 2 David Webster An over view of how archaeologists tie themselves in knots with speculation that can never be substantiated. Harbouring in new territories, encountering new things, affects theory. it quivers and loosens and reveals its fragility, but equally so its ability to spill over, swell and grow into novel and unforeseen directions. hence, a theory of agency becomes pruned and enriched through an encounter with drift matter.
Theoretical Approaches To The Archaeology Of Ancient Greece As an example of theorizing as process, we can track the historically shifting explanations of how species evolve; from the speculation of classic greek thinkers like plato and galen to buffon’s inquiry into natural history to larmarck’s advancing of transformism (sloan 2017). for his part, charles darwin drew from first hand observations and empirical data—collected initially on his. He demonstrates in several places how the relationship between the archaeological and the speculative has been construed historically (e.g. trigger reference trigger 2006, 100, 154, 162–3, 321), frequently contrasting the epistemic roles of ‘fanciful speculation’ against ‘sober investigations’ (trigger reference trigger 2006, 89), ‘mere speculation’ against ‘a hypothesis for. Book review thinking through things: theorising artefacts ethnographically chris wingfield amiria henare, martin holbraad and sari wastell (eds), thinking through things: theorising artefacts ethnographically, london: routledge 2007; 233pp., 1 black and white figure; isbn 1 84472 072 1 (hbk) 1 84472 071 3 (pbk); £65 (hbk) £19.99 (pbk). Archaeological inference, and in drawing philosophical inspiration from a range of speculative philosophies as well as contemporary archaeological theorising, this thesis argues that the desirable strategy in the epistemology of archaeology is not the commonly adopted systematic elimination of speculation.
Comments are closed.