Blueair Blue Pure 211 Review Ultimate Guide 2024

blueair Blue Pure 211 Review Ultimate Guide 2024
blueair Blue Pure 211 Review Ultimate Guide 2024

Blueair Blue Pure 211 Review Ultimate Guide 2024 The blueair blue pure 211 auto received a cadr of 353, 347, and 380 respectively for smoke, dust and pollen — performing impressively in all three categories. it also requires a reasonable. Packing in more power than any of the other models we tested, the blueair pure 211 provides high end cleaning performance to rooms of up to 525 square feet. however, with great power comes great responsibility, and in this case, by responsibility, we mean cost. it costs quite a bit upfront, and even more over its lifetime.

blueair blue pure 211 review Kravelv
blueair blue pure 211 review Kravelv

Blueair Blue Pure 211 Review Kravelv Let's compare the blueair blue pure 211 to its top three competitors, the levoit lv h132, honeywell hpa300, and coway ap 1512hh mighty, in terms of various features: filtration. blueair blue pure 211 : the blue pure 211 utilizes a combination of mechanical and electrostatic filtration to effectively capture particles, allergens, and odors. Weighing in at a hefty 15.5lbs, the blue pure 211 is one of the heaviest air purifiers we’ve tested, so it’s not ideal for moving from room to room. a cord length of 6 feet gives you enough. The blue pure range includes the 411, 311 and 211, each catering to different sized spaces, with the 211 being powerful enough for use in large rooms of up to 540 sq. ft. each purifier uses blueair’s trademarked hepasilent technology, which offers protection from tiny particles while creating minimal noise and using less energy in the process. Test results. in a 150 sq. ft. test environment, the blueair blue pure 211 with approx. 360 cfm was able to lower room particle concentration from 10,000 particles per cubic ft. (relatively unclean air) to 1,000 particles per cubic ft. (very clean air) in 8 minutes. for comparison, the approx. 430 cfm coway airmega 400s did so in 4 minutes.

Comments are closed.