The Good The Bad And The Ugly Movie Review 1968 Roger Ebert 161 minutes ‧ r ‧ 1968. roger ebert. august 3, 2003. 7 min read. clint eastwood, looming large in "the good, the bad and the ugly." a vast empty western landscape. the camera pans across it. then the shot slides onto a sunburned, desperate face. the long shot has become a closeup without a cut, revealing that the landscape was not empty but. The good, the bad and the ugly. action. 161 minutes ‧ r ‧ 1968. roger ebert. january 2, 1968. 3 min read. here is the third of the dollar westerns, so named after the first two (“a fistful of dollars” and “ for a few dollars more “). all three have been tremendously popular and, curiously enough, all three have been pretty good.
The Good The Bad And The Ugly 1966 Turner Classic Movies From chris oliver, waco, tx: “the good, the bad, and the ugly” — it begins with a panoramic shot of an open, barren vista. we hear a dog howl, and out of nowhere the sweaty, dour face of a desperado fills up the shot, with the vista still in focus. this shot is the antithesis of “ aguirre, the wrath of god.”. Our review: parents say (12 ): kids say (77 ): director sergio leone brilliantly displays his flamboyant, larger than life filmmaking style here. he puts an emphasis on long, tense close ups of the actors' faces; widescreen camera compositions; wry humor; quick explosions of action; and surreal music by ennio morricone. 1 'the good, the bad, and the ugly' (1968) image via united artists. sergio leone 's the good, the bad and the ugly needs pretty much no introduction. when it comes to iconic westerns that. Dove of doom • 8 yr. ago. the good, the bad, and the ugly wasn't initially recognized as the great film it is now. you've heard the term "spaghetti western," right? well, it wasn't originally meant as a compliment. a lot of people looked down on italian westerns at the time. roger ebert wrote a 2003 review in which he mentioned that his 1968.
Comments are closed.